BUILDS IMPLEMENTATIONS JEV RELEASED 15 SEP 700+ REPOS IN 3 DAYS INDEPENDENT BENCHMARK IN PROGRESS UPDATED 18 SEP 2026  ·  0xDEC1DE  ·  v0.01
INDEX
§00 / ENTRY
RETURNS
CHOICE + SCORE

Decision Models

State in. Decision out.

Decision models are AI systems built for fast, bounded, probabilistic choices inside software.

SUPPORT Illustrative. Not a measured model result.

STATE “charged twice”

  • billing0.91
  • technical0.05
  • other0.04
INDEX
§01 / IN THE WILD
LISTED
SOURCE
GITHUB, VERIFIED

Built with decision models

More than 700 public repositories mentioning Jev appeared in the three days after launch. Ten of them, each checked against its own repo.

Loading projects…

Building something? Send it to if@decisionmodels.ai and it goes on the list. Inclusion is not endorsement, and nobody pays to be here.

INDEX
§02 / DEFINITION

What is a decision model?

Decision model is the term this site uses for a system whose primary output is a bounded, machine-consumed judgement: a value from a declared answer space, usually with a score over the options. The implementation varies. It might be a classifier head, a direct readout of a language model’s logits, constrained decoding into a schema, or a purpose-trained model such as Jev.

The interface is not new. Function calling and strict structured-output APIs have been able to return schema-valid objects since 2023, and classifier heads are far older than that. What differs between the two paths below is how the answer is produced, not whether software can get a typed one. The open question is whether decision-specific training and serving make that materially better on latency, reliability or calibration.

Autoregressive path

  1. state
  2. token generation
  3. free-form or schema-constrained tokens

Structured-output APIs can guarantee the schema, but the answer is still decoded one token at a time.

Direct decision path

  1. state + declared options
  2. scores or logits
  3. value + distribution

No output-token loop. The answer space is fixed by construction. The returned distribution is not necessarily calibrated.

A worked example

A customer message arrives, and the system needs a category — nothing more:

message: "My card was charged twice."

schema:
  category: ["billing", "technical", "sales", "other"]

A decision model returns the answer in the shape the software asked for. Illustrative output, not a measured model result:

{"category": {"value": "billing", "probability": 0.96}}

The value is already bounded by the declared answer space. Whether the probability beside it is useful is a separate question: a normalised score is not a calibrated one, and calibration has to be measured against representative data.

INDEX
§03 / RATIONALE

Most software
does not need
an essay.
It needs a decision.

Generative

“Based on the context, I believe we should escalate this ticket.”

Has to be read, then interpreted, then turned back into a boolean.

Decision

escalate
true
confidence
0.91

Can be executed. Illustrative, not a measured result.

Many steps inside an agent are narrow judgements rather than writing tasks: routing, classification, scoring, verification, tool selection, workflow branching, approval, anomaly detection, action selection. General-purpose models already handle these through tool calls and structured outputs. A direct decision path may cut latency, output tokens and schema failures when the answer space is already known. Whether it is also more accurate is a separate question, and has to be measured on the workload you actually have.

INDEX
§04 / LINEAGE
SPAN
2017–2026
VERIFIED
ARXIV + HF

This did not start in September

When Jev launched, one of the loudest replies came from a GLiNER2 co-author, pointing out that scoring declared options in a single forward pass has had open weights for years. He is right, and it is worth being precise about what is actually new.

  1. Loading…

What Jev claims that this lineage does not is calibration as an explicit training objective, plus the latency and price bundle. Those are vendor-reported and not yet independently reproduced, which is the gap this site intends to close.

INDEX
§05 / REGISTRY
ENTRIES
SOURCE
data/models.json

Ecosystem

Jev entered early access on 15 September 2026, and the community projects below appeared in the days after it. Entries are marked as hosted models, local experiments, model adapters or tooling, because they are not peers. Claims are sourced to maintainer documentation and marked vendor-reported where nobody has independently reproduced them. Unknown fields are left out rather than guessed. Inclusion is not endorsement, and this is not a complete inventory of classifiers, structured-output models or decision systems.

Hosted

  • Jev

Run it yourself

  • OpenJev
  • bnsd55/openjev
  • kw2828/OpenJev
  • system-one-gemma

Tooling

  • jev-router

One hosted model, four things you can run yourself, one router. The detail for each is below.

Loading models…

INDEX
§06 / NOMENCLATURE
STATUS
UNSETTLED
CANDIDATES
003

What should we call these models?

System One ModelsTypeSafe’s term

Decision Modelsumbrella term used here

Probabilistic Decision Modelsprecise, narrower

The category name is not settled.

Where each one comes from, and what it gets right and wrong:

System One Models
TypeSafe AI's own term for Jev, borrowing the fast-versus-deliberative distinction popularised by Daniel Kahneman. The System 1 and System 2 labels predate his book; Keith Stanovich and Richard West were using them in 2000. Precise, but vendor-specific — and not the only phrase TypeSafe uses. Their own AI primer describes the work as training “decision models with calibrated probabilities instead of optimizing for generated text.”
Decision Models
A broader descriptive term for systems whose primary output is a bounded judgement rather than text. Vendor-neutral, but not semantically empty: "decision model" already means something specific in decision analysis, operations research, and the DMN standard.
Probabilistic Decision Models
More technically precise: a distribution over a bounded set of choices. Narrower, and it invites a claim about calibration that usually has not been measured.

This site uses decision models as a descriptive umbrella for learned systems whose primary output is a bounded judgement. That is a practical choice, not a verdict: TypeSafe calls Jev a System One Model.

Footnote. “Reflex model” is an older adjacent term in AI teaching for a predictor that maps input straight to output with no deliberation. It describes the same shape, but there is no evidence it is in use as a name for the current Jev-related projects, so it is not listed above.

INDEX
§07 / DELTA
AXES
008
LAST VERIFIED
2026-09-18

The two paths, axis by axis

Output path

Autoregressive decoding

Direct or parallel scoring

Answer space

Enforceable with constrained decoding

Fixed by construction

Open-ended generation

Core capability

Absent or secondary

All eight axes, with the qualifications
Axis Autoregressive path Direct decision path
Primary interfaceText, or tool and schema tokensBounded choices, scores or probabilities
Output pathUsually autoregressive decodingDirect or parallel scoring, depending on implementation
Schema validityEnforceable with constrained decodingFixed answer space by construction
Probability accessModel and API dependentReturned over the declared options
CalibrationMust be measuredMust be measured; Jev claims calibration-focused training
Open-ended generationCore capabilityAbsent or secondary
LatencyModel and deployment dependentMay avoid an output-token loop; still deployment dependent
Machine useCommon, via tools and structured outputsThe primary interface

Generalisations, not laws: capabilities vary by model, and the two approaches are complementary rather than mutually exclusive.

INDEX
§08 / SURFACE
LISTED
010
SHAPE
STATE → ACTION

Use cases

Agent routing

Pick which agent or tool handles the next step, with a confidence attached.

  • browser0.76
  • calculator0.16
  • search0.08

Customer support triage

Classify an inbound message and send it to the right queue in a single call.

  • billing0.68
  • technical0.24
  • sales0.08

Fraud and risk scoring

Return approve, review or reject with a probability, inside the transaction path.

  • review0.81
  • reject0.12
  • approve0.07

Tool selection

Choose the right function from a fixed set instead of parsing free text.

  • read_file0.64
  • search0.29
  • ask_user0.07

INDEX
§09 / INDEX
ENTRIES
VERIFIED
2026-09-18

Resources

Loading resources…

INDEX
§10 / SUBSCRIBE
STORES
EMAIL + TIME

Follow the decision-model ecosystem.

New models, benchmarks, APIs and open-source projects.

We store your email address and the time you signed up, in a Cloudflare D1 database. Nothing else. No advertising, and you can ask to be removed at any time by replying to any email or writing to if@decisionmodels.ai.